Review Process

MJAMR (Meadow International Journal of Advancements in Multidisciplinary Research) follows a fast and transparent evaluation process to ensure timely publication while maintaining high academic standards.

1. Initial Screening

   • All submitted manuscripts are first checked by the Editorial Board for plagiarism, copyright issues, and relevance to the journal’s scope.

   • Only original manuscripts that meet the submission guidelines proceed to the peer-review stage.

2. Peer Review Assignment

   • Each manuscript is assigned to at least two qualified reviewers selected by the Editorial Board based on their subject expertise.

   • Wherever possible, one of the reviewers will be an international expert in the field.

   • In special cases, the Editorial Board may assign additional reviewers to strengthen the evaluation.

3. Double-Blind Peer Review

   • The journal follows a double-blind review system, ensuring that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the process.

   • Reviewers assess the manuscript for:

     • Originality and contribution to the field

     • Research design, methodology, and analysis

     • Clarity in presentation of results and conclusions

     • Proper referencing of relevant literature

     • Quality of language and overall readability

4. Review Outcomes
   Based on the reviewers’ recommendations, the decision may be:

   • Accept as it is

   • Minor or major revision required

   • Reject

At least one positive review is mandatory for a manuscript to move forward.

1. Revision Process

   • Authors receiving revision requests are expected to address the reviewers’ comments carefully and submit the revised version within the time frame specified by the Editorial Board.

   • If revisions are not submitted within one month, the manuscript will be treated as a new submission and undergo a fresh review cycle.

   • In some cases, multiple rounds of revision may be required before final acceptance.

2. Final Decision

   • The Editorial Board, in consultation with reviewers’ reports, makes the final decision on acceptance or rejection.

   • Once accepted, manuscripts proceed to the publication stage with minimal delay.